a case study on management styles

• Free Case Studies
• Business Essays

Write My Case Study

Buy Case Study

Case Study Help

• Case Study For Sale
• Case Study Services
• Hire Writer

Management Styles Analysis

Management Styles Management is a far-running subject and there are many definitions of management. From my point of view, management is described as a process to get something done in the business environment. It is the person called Manager who gets various jobs done by assign works to people working with him/her. How the Manager can get the things done effectively and efficiently is an important problem that should be researched. Robert Tannenbaum and Warren H.

Schmidt (1958, 1973), who argued that the style of leadership is dependent upon the prevailing circumstance, therefore leaders should exercise a range of management styles and deploy them as appropriate. In fact, a management style is an overall method of leadership used by a manager. Managers should be able to understand the concept of management styles which are characteristic ways relating to subordinates in different situations. In this essay, management styles and how they demonstrated in different cultures will be addressed.

We Will Write a Custom Case Study Specifically For You For Only $13.90/page!

Also, the factors that affect the formation of such characteristic management styles will also be discussed. The aim of this essay is to provide some suggestions for managers in international companies with regard to the area of management in a foreign culture background.

There are two sharply contrasting styles: Autocratic and Permissive. Furthermore, these two categories are broken down into smaller subsets, which I will not discuss in detail in this essay. Each of the two styles has its own characteristics. Autocratic” means that Manager makes all decisions unilaterally, while “Permissive” means Manager permits subordinates to take part in decision making and also managers prefer to gives subordinates a considerable degree of autonomy in completing routine work activities. Although it may sound better to conduct a permissive manage style which might stimulate the employees to engage more into their job since they are also invited to take certain responsibility of the company’s fate.

However, that’s not always the case.

Therefore, in the fast development of economic globalization, how to properly utilize these different management styles according to local situations is a hot topic. Due to the various custom and belief in specific backgrounds, different management styles are required in different parts of the world. In my opinion, there are three key factors that influence management styles: culture, policy, and custom. How they affect the management styles are illustrated in this paragraph.

First of all, culture shapes both the individual and collective behavior in a society. Therefore, there is no doubt that management is closely associated with culture.

The management style and culture is closely related to each other. Diversity of cultures determines diversity of management. There are different cultures in different countries, different nationalities, and different societies, which means that there must be different management styles in order to deal with such specific situations. For instance, the two typical different management styles in Japan and the US both built on national cultures.

Then, management is also a culture itself. The leading ideologies, management theories and management styles are all important parts of the enterprise culture.

Management style varies from cultures. Therefore, it is crucial to study culture first and thereby decide which management style is suitable. Then, different policies and social rules are the other important factors which influence that influences management styles.

Economy cannot avoid laws, since any business operations in a country must obey the different policies announced by different countries. Different countries have different law systems and social rules and no matter what management styles should observe the law and rules. Only within the legal framework can a management style be applied.

In a word, law system directly influences management styles. For instance, managers can encourage his staffs to work overtime in some countries but it violates the labor law in some other countries. Apart from culture and law, different business customs also can influence management styles.

Business custom is part of a nation’s culture. It has been formed in a long time, maybe several decades, several countries, or even thousands years such as China and Japan. The custom includes how to manage enterprise, how to treat customers, how to get along with leaders and subordinates.

Different countries and economic systems have different answers and standards. For example, in China, “face issue” is important for individuals in traditional custom. And appreciation or encouragements should be made before any criticism.

If managers point out employees’ mistake in front of other workers directly, the employee might feel ashamed and reluctant to cooperate with the manager in future, which surely will bring barriers to management. There are also various customs in different regions, management styles are also changing according to such differences.

I would like to take Japan and the US as examples to discuss how these key factors, culture, policy, and customs influence management styles in specific circumstances. Obviously, Japan and the US display an obvious contrast in the aspect of culture, society and ideology, etc. I would like to discuss the features of Japan and the US at first.

First of all, the US is a nation with a large number of immigrants, which determines that its national culture is identified with individualism. As is known to all, the US is country with great freedom.

The enterprise culture in the US also grasps the core content of such freedom for individual employee. Certainly, this individualism is rather than selfishness, but emphasis on the independence, motility and personal achievement. As a result, the management in the US also encourages individualism and free development of personality.

They pay more attention to the efficiency of organization and production. They focus less on personal behaviors than what Japanese companies do. For example, employees in the US always prefer companies which give them certain personal time and space.

This trend also regulates the management styles to permissive. On the other hand, Japan is a very densely populated homogeneous country.

Their society is stable and uniform, so that Japan has a strong similarity in their behaviors. Japan, as an emerging capitalist country, it has much feudalistic remnants in enterprise culture and management. Because of paternalism in Japan, they respect authority and mastery. They accept hierarchical system and absolutely comply with the leaders and authorities. Then they have a form of familial capitalism.

In the company there is a dependence relation among the people according to how long they have been in the company.

There is a clear-cut personal relationship which is “Sennpai” and “Kouahai” (Senior and Junior). “Sennpai” should help, cultivate and responsible for “Kouahai” and “Kouahai” should respect “Sennpai” unconditionally. Most important, they value collectivism rather than individualism. They emphasize a sense of belonging to the team and loyal to enterprise. As the discussion above, management styles must be suitable for the place where the management is taking place.

Like, these two countries with distinctive cultural and social background, Japan and the US have quite different management styles.

In other words, enterprises want to explore oversea business, they should take different management styles in order to get most effective management. Apparently, autocratic management styles are suitable for regions where people respect collective value more, like the situation in Japan. In this management style, Manager can make decisions unilaterally and effectively without wasting time for a democratic decision.

This style can ensure a prompt decision thus master the business opportunities speedily and improve efficiency. Then while permissive should be more effective for the enterprises in the US, since the employees pay more attention to their individual value.

The manager should allow the employees to take part in decision-making: therefore everything is agreed by the majority and everyone can work with responsibility. In summary, management styles not only clearly exist in different regions of the world, it should arouse the special attention of managers and all the enterprises.

Meanwhile there is no management that remains unchanged for an international enterprise because they are running business in different cultures of the world. Management styles should be adjusted with the changing of the cultural background, specific law systems and traditional customs. Reference Abbott, Keith (2006), The impact of management style on the employment relations of different sized organizations, Australasian journal of business and social inquiry, vol. 4, no.

2, pp. 1-20 Deaton, D. (1985). Management style and large-scale survey evidence.

Industrial Relations Journal, 16, 2, 67–71. Edwards, 1993 P.

Edwards, A. Ferner and K. Sisson, People and the Process of management in the multinational company: A review with some illustrations, Industrial Relations Research Unit, Coventry (1993). Purcell, 1987 J. Purcell, Mapping management styles in employment relations.

Journal of Management Studies,  24 5 (1987), pp. 533–548. Wolf D. Reitsperger. (2007).

‘Japanese Management: Coping with British Industrial Relations’. Journal of Management Studies. : Wiley.

Related posts:

• Case Study on Leadership Styles
• Case Study on Parenting Styles
• An Indepth Analysis of Gender-Based Conversational Styles [Rough Draft]
• Authoritative and Participative Leadership Styles
• Parenting Styles Argumentative Essay
• Leadership Styles
• Learning Styles

Quick Links

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Testimonials

Our Services

Case Study Writing Services

Case Studies For Sale

Our Company

Welcome to the world of case studies that can bring you high grades! Here, at ACaseStudy.com, we deliver professionally written papers, and the best grades for you from your professors are guaranteed!

[email protected] 804-506-0782 350 5th Ave, New York, NY 10118, USA

Acasestudy.com © 2007-2019 All rights reserved.

Hi! I'm Anna

Would you like to get a custom case study? How about receiving a customized one?

Haven't Found The Case Study You Want?

For Only $13.90/page

Every Day Development

every-day-development.com is a virtual space where leaders find knowledge, experience sharing, inspirations, advice and fun in relation to leadership and talent

TOP 5: LEADERSHIP CASE STUDIES

There is so much we could learn from the experience of other leaders.

Below there is the “TOP 5 list of Leadership Case Studies” we published on every-day-development.com in 2022.

1. Steve Jobs (Apple) – “Steve Jobs’ journey to become Apple CEO”

LEADERSHIP CASE STUDY: STEVE JOBS (APPLE)

2. Elon Musk (Tesla, SpaceX, X) – “Disruptive leadership”

LEADERSHIP CASE STUDY: ELON MUSK (TESLA, SpaceX, X)

3. Emma Walmsley (GSK) – “Changing today to win in the future”

LEADERSHIP CASE STUDY: EMMA WALMSLEY (GSK)

4. Elisabeth Holmes (Theranos) – “A story of Elisabeth Holmes and Fakeranos”

LEADERSHIP CASE STUDY: ELISABETH HOLMES (THERANOS)

5. H. Lawrence Culp Jr (GE) – “A story of an external CEO in GE”

LEADERSHIP CASE STUDY: H. LAWRENCE CULP JR. (GE)

Subscribe to EDD and be immediately informed about new content + get a complimentary Develo Coffee :

Type your email…

BUILDING YOUR DEVELOPMENT PLAN

BOOST YOUR WORKWEEK PRODUCTIVITY

TRUST BUILDER vs. TRUST DESTROYER

HIGHWAY TO BURNOUT

7 HABITS TO STRENGTHEN OUR MENTAL HEALTH

Share this:

18 thoughts on “ top 5: leadership case studies ”.

• Pingback: TOP 10 BUSINESS AND MOTIVATIONAL BOOKS – Every Day Development
• Pingback: HAPPY FRIDAY! – Every Day Development
• Pingback: 7 HABITS TO DEVELOP RESILIENCE – Every Day Development
• Pingback: SIMPLIFIER vs. COMPLIFIER – Every Day Development
• Pingback: HOW CURIOSITY BOOSTS PERSONAL GROWTH – Every Day Development
• Pingback: TEAM MANAGEMENT – Every Day Development
• Pingback: HOW TO … GET EXTRA TIME? – Every Day Development
• Pingback: 7 HABITS OF AN AUTHENTIC LEADER – Every Day Development
• Pingback: A thought on… CHANGE AGILITY – Every Day Development
• Pingback: 7 KEY COMPETENCIES OF YOUR FUTURE SUCCESS – Every Day Development
• Pingback: TRUST BUILDER vs. TRUST DESTROYER – Every Day Development
• Pingback: LIFETIME OF LEARNING – Every Day Development
• Pingback: 30-MINUTE DEVELOPMENT BREAK – Every Day Development
• Pingback: 2023 SUMMARY: A YEAR OF GROWTH AND GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT – Every Day Development
• Pingback: 7 ATTRIBUTES OF VISIONARY LEADERS – Every Day Development
• Pingback: LEADERSHIP CASE STUDY: EMMA WALMSLEY (GSK) – Every Day Development
• Pingback: A THOUGHT ON … PASSION – Every Day Development
• Pingback: Success Stories: Case Studies on Leadership and Mental Health

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Blog at WordPress.com.

• Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
• Subscribe Subscribed
• Copy shortlink
• Report this content
• View post in Reader
• Manage subscriptions
• Collapse this bar

• High School
• You don't have any recent items yet.
• You don't have any courses yet.
• You don't have any books yet.
• You don't have any Studylists yet.
• Information

MGT 410 - Organizational behavior case study

 leadership and organizational behavior (mgt 410), colorado state university, students also viewed.

• MKT 479 Easy jet strategy analysis
• Ford Pinto Recall Case Study
• EXAM 2 ART study guide
• Writing Assignment #1 - Utilitarian Method; CI Method A; Virtue Method A; Business Ethics - Case Analysis
• Lecture 12 - Olivera Notaros
• Spinal Cord - Dr. Clapp

Related documents

• Bachelors Business Management Program Sheet 2
• Lecture Notes week 6 - Professor: Dr. Abigail Veliquette
• ECE251 SP22 Midterm Exam Pt1 Guide
• Saks Fifth Avenue Company Profile & SWOT
• Campbell - 1991 - Internal Atmospheric Pressure and Composition for Planet Surface Habitats and Extravehicular Mobility Units
• Pintura Case Analysis Final

Related Studylists

Preview text.

Celine Ross Professor Kimberly MGT 410: Leadership and Organizational Behavior 19 July 2019 Organizational Behavior – GM Crisis I. EVALUATE LEADERSHIP THEORY A. Describe a leadership style used in the case study and why there was a shift in leadership style throughout the case study According to the case study, the leadership style that has been used in the company was laissez-faire. Laissez-faire can be defined as a form of leadership style where there is no leader and therefore, there is no direction and guidance. It has been found that the implementation of this leadership style leads to a decrease in productivity and poor performance. And this was the case with GM, i. the top-level leaders and executives has left the decision (so that the responsibility would not fall on them regarding the decisions that were being made) to be made by low-level managers, which eventually led to the crisis and thus, began the blame-game and lack of accountability (STU). This sort of leadership leaves a negative effect on the culture of the company and it can be seen in the case study. Once the crisis became a national issue, the company decided to change its leadership style and from laissez-faire to affiliative. Affiliative leadership was selected because the company wants to promote harmony and conflict resolution (Eure Consulting). Implementing affiliative leadership means an increase in employee morale, autonomy, and employee trust. B. Explain the characteristics and decisions of management in the case study that help explain the shift in leadership style

The characteristics that have been pointed out in the case study are defensiveness, nonchalant and reactiveness. For example, at the beginning of the crisis, no one was willing to own up to the mistakes that were made and instead reacted by pointing fingers at each other. And not only that to defend themselves, the company fired 15 of its people, while knowing that countless people have come and gone and the issue has been there for the past 11 years (Kuppler). The case study shows that the decisions that were made after the shift in leadership were insincere, i. the company attempted to change its culture because 1) the crisis had become a national, 2) the company was under heavy public scrutiny, and 3) they were seeking redemption so that the company could save its face. C. Identify the internal and external influences on the organization that may have caused the shift in leadership style. Be sure to explain your choices The internal influences on the organization that might have caused a shift in the leadership style are 1) lack of accountability and responsibility (i. no one was willing to accept the mistakes and decisions they made), 2) quality and safety issues (i. there were no quality and safety standards in place when it came to ignition switch and this led to a death of 13 people), and 3) whistleblowers (i. employee who saw the destruction the company was headed for) (Kuppler). The external influences that may have caused a shift in the leadership style are 1) the outrage of the public (i. the death 13 people has led to public outrage and they demanded that the company needs to take full responsibility), 2) government legislation (i. the company was asked to appear in front of House and Senate Subcommittees to explain the reason behind the

B. Identify specific examples from the case study that demonstrate the internal culture present within the organization Some of the examples of GM culture are as follows.  GM Salute: here the GM salute means where a person crosses his/her arms and points to someone else and this suggests that the responsibility belong to that person and not to them. Simply put, the company has a culture of avoiding responsibility (Kuppler).  GM Nod: here the GM nod means where everyone is nodding (i. agreeing) to a plan of action but then leaving the room and have no intention of following through. The is just considered to be an empty gesture.  No Need for Urgency: when it comes to issues like the ignition switch, the company had no sense of urgency, thus the problem of switch ignition remained for 11 years (Kuppler). C. INSIGHTS & CONCLUSIONS A. Explain why the leadership style(s) and the internal culture of the organization complement each other or do not complement each other The previous leadership style and internal culture of the company do not complement each other. For example, the leadership style of the company was laissez-faire (where leaders believe that the employees will be able to handle all things and will act with honesty and integrity), but this was not the case. The employees overlooked the issues and blamed each other when mistakes were made and this led to the organizational culture becoming dysfunctional. With a new CEO, quick changes were made, not only in leadership but also in the culture. Therefore, the leadership style and the internal culture of the company complement’s each other now. The company is now becoming more of a Supportive model with affiliative leadership style in place.

B. Explain whether or not the changes in leadership style or internal culture of the organization influenced each other The changes in the leadership style or internal culture of the company tend to influence each other because leadership has a powerful influence on the culture of the company. Leaders are the ones that set tones for how the employees need to behave and how they perceive their work. Simply put, leadership and culture tend to go hand in hand. Leaders are employees’ role model and they are constantly observing how a leader behaves and acts in different situations and pick up cues from them. so, we can simply say, when there is a change in leadership there is bound to be a change in the culture of an organization. C. Explain how the leadership styles and internal culture of the organization may have influenced the behavior of the employees within the organization. You could consider providing specific instances or influences. Examples from within the case study to support your response The leadership style and internal culture of the company have influenced the behaviors of the employees significantly. For example, due to the style of leadership (Laissez-faire) there was a lack of communication between the employees and the management and it also seemed that there was also some reluctance when it came to raising issues, i. even the employees see their leaders evading all problems they also tend to do the same and this is what happened at GM. Another example would be the avoidance of not accepting one’s responsibility, i. at GM leaders were known for the GM salute where they blamed others for the mistakes and this is what the employees also did with the ignition switch.

• Multiple Choice

Course :  Leadership and Organizational Behavior (MGT 410)

University : colorado state university.

• More from: CR CR Celine Ross 999+ impact 999+ Colorado State University Discover more
• More from: HR by Nouf Abdulla 27 27 documents Go to Studylist

• SUGGESTED TOPICS
• The Magazine
• Newsletters
• Managing Yourself
• Managing Teams
• Work-life Balance
• The Big Idea
• Data & Visuals
• Case Selections
• HBR Learning
• Topic Feeds
• Account Settings
• Email Preferences

Management styles

• Leadership and managing people
• Cross-cultural management
• Cross-functional management
• Dismissing employees

Highway of the Mind

• Thomas A. Stewart
• January 01, 2004

How to Speak Confidently to Your Team During Chaotic Times

• Darcy Eikenberg
• August 25, 2023

How to Make the Most of Your Company's Strategy

• Stephen Bungay
• From the January–February 2011 Issue

CEOs Earn Less at More-Prestigious Firms

• Florens Focke
• Alexandra Niessen Ruenzi
• February 02, 2017

Ten Charts That Show We've All Got a Case of the Mondays

• Gretchen Gavett
• June 14, 2013

Best of Intentions (HBR Case Study)

• John Humphreys
• July 01, 2002

Why Fights Erupt in Family Businesses

• Josh Baron and Rob Lachenauer
• July 09, 2013

Visualizations That Really Work

• Scott Berinato
• From the June 2016 Issue

Bringing Your Strategy to the Front Line

• James Allen
• January 24, 2012

Is Pfizer's Jeffrey Kindler Brave or Crazy?

• Bill Taylor
• January 28, 2009

What Makes the Best Infographics So Convincing

• Andrea Ovans
• April 22, 2014

Making Partner: The Mentor's Guide to the Psychological Journey

• Herminia Ibarra
• From the March–April 2000 Issue

Reinventing Performance Management

• Marcus Buckingham
• Ashley Goodall
• September 13, 2016

Demystifying Japanese Management Practices

• Charles Y. Yang
• From the November 1984 Issue

Pygmalion in Management (HBR Classic)

• J. Sterling Livingston
• From the January 2003 Issue

Skills of an Effective Administrator (HBR Classic)

• Robert L. Katz
• From the September 1974 Issue

Even the Thought of Earning Less than Their Wives Changes How Men Behave

• Dan Cassino
• April 19, 2016

To Build a Strong Culture, Create Rules That Are Unique to Your Company

• December 03, 2019

How to Steer Clear of Office Gossip

• Victor Lipman
• October 19, 2016

When Salaries Aren't Secret (HBR Case Study)

• May 01, 2001

The 10 Most Popular HBR Articles of 2024

• HBR Editors
• December 20, 2024

Stop Ignoring Your High Performers

• Ruth Gotian
• October 08, 2024

Why Cynics Are Less Likely to Succeed

• August 26, 2024

3 Ways Humility Can Undermine Your Leadership

• Tony Martignetti
• March 04, 2024

The Best Leaders Can’t Be Replaced by AI

• Rasmus Hougaard
• Jacqueline Carter
• Rob Stembridge
• January 12, 2024

How to Sustain Your Empathy in Difficult Times

• From the January–February 2024 Issue

How the Geeks Rewrote the Rules of Management

• September 15, 2023

How the Best Leadership Teams Navigate Uncertain Times

• June 22, 2023

What New Leaders Shouldn’t Do

• Antonella Pisani
• June 12, 2023

Why Managers Should Think More Like Hackers

• Paulo Savaget
• April 06, 2023

It Takes Versatility to Lead in a Volatile World

• Robert B. (Rob) Kaiser
• Ryne A. Sherman
• Robert Hogan
• March 07, 2023

How to Determine Your Work Style as a New Manager

• Claire Hughes Johnson
• March 03, 2023

What Leadership Style Do You Major In?

• Hope Horner
• February 10, 2023

Managers, Stop Distracting Your Employees

• January 12, 2023

LinkedIn CEO Ryan Roslansky: Skills, Not Degrees, Matter Most in Hiring

• November 17, 2022

What Great Remote Managers Do Differently

• Raghu Krishnamoorthy
• October 26, 2022

Research: The Complicated Role of Hope in the Workplace

• Katina Sawyer
• October 18, 2022

Ask an Expert: What Skills Do I Need to Become a Great Manager?

• Ursula Kralova
• March 14, 2022

Managers, Here’s How to Be a Better Ally in the Remote Workplace

• Melinda Briana Epler
• January 27, 2022

Building a Developmental Culture: the Birth of Deloitte University

• Boris Groysberg
• Maureen Gibbons
• Joshua Bronstein
• October 19, 2010

ARISE: A Destination-for-a-Day Spa

• Michael Beer
• Lynda St. Clair
• Charles C. Heckscher
• August 20, 2012

McKinsey & Co.: An Institution at a Crossroads

• Ashish Nanda
• Kelley Morrell
• December 04, 2002

Motorola-Elma

• Janis L. Gogan
• Shoshana Zuboff
• Gloria Schuck
• Michael J. Handel
• May 10, 1994

Saga of Prince Jefri and KPMG (A): Mystery of the Missing Billions

• May 07, 1999

What Were They Thinking?: Unconventional Wisdom About Management

• Jeffrey Pfeffer
• July 10, 2007

Developing Professionals: The BCG Way (B)

• February 27, 2004

Bang & Olufsen: Design Driven Innovation

• Daniela Beyersdorfer
• Robert D. Austin
• September 01, 2006

Paul Newman's Last Act: The Second Generation

• Randel Carlock
• May 28, 2018

ATF, Inc.: Fasteners and Family

• John L. Ward
• Brent C. Stern
• Carol Adler Zsolnay
• Sachin Waikar
• July 28, 2016

The Resort in Pueblo Valley (B)

• Christine Blondel
• August 01, 2004

Broken Trust: Role of Professionals in the Enron Debacle

• December 07, 2002

Rob Parson at Morgan Stanley (C)

• M. Diane Burton
• February 09, 1998

Marks and Spencer Ltd. (A)

• Cynthia A. Montgomery
• March 25, 1991

Family Feud: Andersen vs. Andersen (B)

• Scot Landry
• April 10, 2000

What Went Wrong with Boeing's 737 Max? (B)

• William W. George
• Amram Migdal
• January 04, 2021

Jeanne Lewis at Staples, Inc. (B)

• Linda A. Hill
• Kristin C. Doughty
• November 18, 1998

Coca-Cola Co. (B): Douglas Daft Takes Over

• Michael D. Watkins
• Carin-Isabel Knoop
• Cate Reavis
• April 13, 2000

Florida Power Light Quality Improvement (QI) Story Exercise (B)

• Christopher W.L. Hart
• Michael Montelongo
• October 24, 1988

Nike in Transition (B): Phil Knight Returns

• Christopher A. Bartlett
• Robert W. Lightfoot
• May 06, 1992

Popular Topics

Partner center.

Case Studies of Successful Leaders: The Skills, Strategies, and Decisions That Made Them Unstoppable

Table of Contents

Introduction: defining successful leadership.

What makes a successful leader? Is it charisma? Intelligence? Vision?

The truth is, there is no one-size-fits-all answer to this question. Success in leadership can vary depending on the field, the organization, and the individual leader. However, there are some common traits that successful leaders tend to share.

Successful leaders are typically:

• Visionary:  They have a clear vision for the future and are able to inspire others to share that vision.
• Strategic:  They are able to develop and execute plans to achieve their goals.
• Decisive:  They are able to make tough decisions and stick to them.
• Communicative:  They are able to communicate their vision and plans to others in a clear and concise way.
• Motivational:  They are able to inspire and motivate others to achieve great things.

In addition to these core traits, successful leaders also need to be able to adapt to the changing needs of their organizations and the world around them. In today’s complex and globalized business environment, leaders need to be able to think strategically, make data-driven decisions, and manage a diverse workforce.

This article will explore the skills, strategies, and decisions that have made some of the world’s most successful leaders unstoppable.  We will look at leaders from all walks of life, including business, politics, and activism. We will also discuss the challenges that these leaders have faced and how they have overcome them.

By studying the case studies of successful leaders, we can learn from their experiences and apply their lessons to our own lives.  We can become more effective leaders and achieve greater success in our careers and personal lives.

Why Leadership Skills Matter in Achieving Success

Leadership skills are essential for achieving success in any field. In business, effective leadership can lead to increased productivity, innovation, and profitability. In politics, strong leadership can lead to better policies and improved public services. In activism, effective leadership can lead to social change and progress.

There is a wealth of data and studies that support the correlation between leadership effectiveness and organizational success.  A study by Harvard Business Review found that companies with highly effective leaders outperformed their competitors by 26% . Another study by the Center for Creative Leadership found that teams with strong leaders are more likely to be engaged, productive, and innovative.

Leadership skills are also essential for achieving societal impact.  Effective leaders can inspire and motivate others to work towards a common goal. They can build consensus and create change. For example, Nelson Mandela’s leadership was instrumental in ending apartheid in South Africa. Mahatma Gandhi’s leadership helped to free India from British rule.

In today’s complex and globalized world, leaders need to be able to master multiple leadership styles.  Transformational leaders are able to inspire and motivate others to achieve great things. Charismatic leaders are able to build strong personal connections with their followers. Democratic leaders are able to create a sense of ownership and involvement among their team members.

Effective leaders are able to adapt their leadership style to the needs of the situation.  They are able to be directive when necessary, but they are also able to delegate and empower others. They are able to build strong relationships with their followers, but they are also able to hold them accountable.

By mastering multiple leadership styles, leaders can increase their effectiveness and achieve greater success.  They can create a more positive and productive work environment, inspire and motivate their team members, and build strong relationships with their stakeholders.

In short, leadership skills are essential for achieving success in any field.  They can help leaders to shape organizational success, engage employees, and achieve societal impact.

Case Study 1: Resilience and Vision – Nelson Mandela’s Journey to Freedom

Nelson Mandela was a South African anti-apartheid revolutionary, political leader, and philanthropist who served as the first president of South Africa from 1994 to 1999. He was a key figure in the fight against apartheid, the system of racial segregation that was in place in South Africa from 1948 to 1994.

• Vision:  Mandela had a clear vision of a free and democratic South Africa. He was able to articulate this vision to others and inspire them to join him in the fight against apartheid.
• Resilience:  Mandela faced many challenges and setbacks in his life. He was imprisoned for 27 years, but he never gave up on his vision of a free South Africa.

Mandela’s ability to maintain a clear vision of a free South Africa, despite adversity, was essential to his success. He was able to keep his focus on the long-term goal, even when things were difficult. Mandela’s unwavering resilience was also a key factor in his success. He never gave up on his dream, even when it seemed impossible.

Real-World Application:

Modern leaders can apply Mandela’s traits of vision and resilience in organizational change or crisis management. By having a clear vision of the future and by being resilient in the face of adversity, leaders can inspire their teams to achieve great things.

Here are some specific examples of how leaders can apply Mandela’s traits in real-world situations:

• In organizational change:  Leaders can use Mandela’s vision to create a clear and compelling vision for the future of their organization. This vision can help to motivate employees and stakeholders to embrace change. Leaders can also use Mandela’s resilience to overcome the challenges that are inevitable in any change process.
• In crisis management:  Leaders can use Mandela’s vision to help their organizations navigate through crises. By having a clear understanding of the organization’s goals and values, leaders can make decisions that are in the best interests of the organization. Leaders can also use Mandela’s resilience to help their organizations recover from crises and emerge stronger than before.

Mandela’s legacy is one of hope and inspiration. He showed the world that even the most difficult challenges can be overcome with vision and resilience.

Case Study 2: Transformational Leadership – Satya Nadella’s Reformation of Microsoft

Satya Nadella is an Indian-born American business executive who has been the CEO of Microsoft since 2014. Under Nadella’s leadership, Microsoft has undergone a significant transformation, becoming more innovative, agile, and customer-focused.

• Empathy:  Nadella is known for his empathy-driven leadership style. He is able to understand the needs of his employees, customers, and partners, and he uses this understanding to make decisions that benefit all stakeholders.
• Innovation:  Nadella is also a strong believer in innovation. He has invested heavily in research and development, and he has encouraged his employees to take risks and think outside the box.

Nadella’s empathy-driven leadership style has helped to shift Microsoft’s culture, making it more inclusive, innovative, and agile. Nadella has created a culture where employees feel valued and respected. He has also empowered his employees to make decisions and take risks. This has led to a more innovative and agile Microsoft.

One of the most significant decisions that Nadella made was to prioritize cloud computing. This decision has helped Microsoft to regain its position as a leader in the tech industry. Microsoft’s cloud computing platform, Azure, is now one of the most popular in the world.

Empathy is a powerful tool that leaders can use to transform their organizations. Here are a few tips for leveraging empathy in corporate culture transformation:

• Listen to your employees.  Make an effort to listen to your employees’ concerns and ideas. This will help you to understand their needs and to make decisions that are in their best interests.
• Be open to feedback.  Encourage your employees to give you feedback, both positive and negative. This will help you to identify areas for improvement and to create a more positive work environment.
• Empower your employees.  Give your employees the authority to make decisions and take risks. This will help to create a more innovative and agile organization.

By following these tips, leaders can create a more empathetic and innovative corporate culture. This will lead to increased employee engagement, productivity, and customer satisfaction.

Case Study 3: Strategic Communication – Jacinda Ardern’s Crisis Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Jacinda Ardern is a New Zealand politician who has been the Prime Minister of New Zealand since 2017. She has been praised for her leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic, which has been widely regarded as one of the most successful in the world.

• Strategic communication:  Ardern is a skilled communicator who has used her platform to effectively manage the pandemic in New Zealand. She has been transparent with the public about the challenges that the country has faced, and she has provided clear and concise information about the government’s response.
• Empathy:  Ardern is also a compassionate leader who has shown empathy for the people of New Zealand during the pandemic. She has acknowledged the sacrifices that people have made, and she has provided support to those who have been affected by the virus.

Ardern’s strategic communication style has been essential to her success in managing the pandemic. She has used a variety of channels to communicate with the public, including televised briefings, social media, and press conferences. She has also been responsive to the public’s concerns, and she has made changes to the government’s response based on feedback from the public.

One of the most effective aspects of Ardern’s communication strategy has been her use of social media. She has used platforms such as Facebook and Instagram to connect with the public directly. She has also used social media to share information about the pandemic and to answer questions from the public.

Leaders can learn a lot from Ardern’s strategic communication style. Here are a few tips for communicating effectively in high-stress situations:

• Be transparent.  Be honest with the public about the challenges that you are facing. This will help to build trust and credibility.
• Be clear and concise.  When communicating with the public, use clear and concise language. Avoid jargon and technical terms.
• Be responsive.  Be responsive to the public’s concerns. Listen to their feedback and make changes to your plans based on their input.
• Use a variety of channels.  Use a variety of channels to communicate with the public. This will help to ensure that your message reaches as many people as possible.

By following these tips, leaders can communicate effectively in high-stress situations and build trust with the public.

Deep Dive into Leadership Styles: Matching Skills to Situations

There are many different leadership styles, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. The best leadership style for a particular situation will depend on a number of factors, including the leader’s personality, the team’s needs, and the organizational culture.

Here is a brief overview of some of the most common leadership styles:

• Transformational leadership:  Transformational leaders are able to inspire and motivate their followers to achieve great things. They are visionary leaders who are able to see the big picture and to articulate a clear and compelling vision for the future.
• Servant leadership:  Servant leaders put the needs of their followers first. They are humble and selfless leaders who are always willing to help others.
• Authoritative leadership:  Authoritative leaders are strong and decisive leaders who are able to make tough decisions. They are clear about their expectations and they hold their followers accountable.
• Democratic leadership:  Democratic leaders involve their followers in the decision-making process. They are open to feedback and they value the input of others.
• Laissez-faire leadership:  Laissez-faire leaders give their followers a lot of freedom and autonomy. They are hands-off leaders who believe that their followers are capable of self-managing.

Here is a chart comparing these leadership styles with real-world examples:

When to use different leadership styles:.

The best leadership style for a particular situation will depend on a number of factors, including the leader’s personality, the team’s needs, and the organizational culture. However, there are some general guidelines that can help leaders choose the right style for the situation.

• Transformational leadership:  Transformational leadership is most effective in situations where the team needs to be inspired and motivated to achieve a common goal.
• Servant leadership:  Servant leadership is most effective in situations where the team needs to be supported and nurtured.
• Authoritative leadership:  Authoritative leadership is most effective in situations where the team needs clear direction and accountability.
• Democratic leadership:  Democratic leadership is most effective in situations where the team needs to be involved in the decision-making process.
• Laissez-faire leadership:  Laissez-faire leadership is most effective in situations where the team is highly skilled and motivated and does not need close supervision.

By understanding the different leadership styles and when to use them, leaders can increase their effectiveness and achieve greater success.

How Skills Translate into Decisions: Breaking Down Key Moments in Leadership

Nelson mandela’s negotiation tactics:.

Mandela was a master negotiator who was able to achieve his goals without resorting to violence. He was able to build relationships with his opponents and to find common ground. One of Mandela’s most famous negotiation successes was his role in the negotiations that led to the end of apartheid in South Africa.

Mandela’s negotiation skills were influenced by his empathy and his ability to see the world from the perspective of others. He was also a skilled communicator who was able to articulate his vision for a free and democratic South Africa.

Satya Nadella’s cloud-first strategy:

When Nadella became CEO of Microsoft in 2014, the company was struggling to compete with its rivals in the cloud computing market. Nadella made the bold decision to shift Microsoft’s focus to cloud computing. This decision has been a major success for Microsoft. Azure, Microsoft’s cloud computing platform, is now one of the most popular in the world.

Nadella’s decision to focus on cloud computing was influenced by his vision for the future of technology. He believed that cloud computing would be essential for businesses in the future. He was also willing to take risks and to make changes to Microsoft’s business model.

Jacinda Ardern’s pandemic decisions:

Ardern’s leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic has been widely praised. She made a number of tough decisions, including closing the country’s borders and implementing a strict lockdown. These decisions were unpopular at the time, but they ultimately helped to save lives and protect the New Zealand economy.

Ardern’s pandemic decisions were influenced by her empathy and her commitment to public service. She was also willing to listen to the advice of experts and to make decisions based on the best available evidence.

These decisions were all pivotal moments in the careers of these leaders.  They had a major impact on the lives of their followers and on the course of history.

Alternative paths:

If Mandela had not been able to negotiate a peaceful end to apartheid, South Africa could have descended into a civil war.

If Nadella had not shifted Microsoft’s focus to cloud computing, the company could have lost its leadership position in the tech industry.

If Ardern had not made the tough decisions that she did during the pandemic, New Zealand could have suffered a much greater loss of life and economic damage.

These examples show how the skills of leaders can translate into decisions that have a major impact on the world.

Common Traits Shared by Successful Leaders Across Fields

There are many different leadership styles and approaches, but there are also some common traits that successful leaders across fields share. These traits include:

• Resilience:  Successful leaders are able to bounce back from setbacks and challenges. They are not afraid to take risks, and they are willing to learn from their mistakes.
• Adaptability:  Successful leaders are able to adapt to change. They are able to think on their feet and to come up with creative solutions to problems.
• Vision:  Successful leaders have a clear vision for the future. They are able to articulate their vision to others and to inspire them to work towards it.
• Communication:  Successful leaders are able to communicate effectively. They are able to clearly and concisely articulate their thoughts and ideas.
• Empathy:  Successful leaders are able to understand the needs and perspectives of others. They are able to build relationships and to create a positive work environment.

Here are some quotes from successful leaders on these traits:

• Resilience:  “The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall.” – Nelson Mandela
• Adaptability:  “The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance.” – Alan Watts
• Vision:  “The future belongs to those who believe in the beauty of their dreams.” – Eleanor Roosevelt
• Communication:  “The most important thing in communication is hearing what isn’t said.” – Peter Drucker
• Empathy:  “Empathy is seeing with the eyes of another, listening with the ears of another, and feeling with the heart of another.” – Alfred Adler

Venn diagram of overlapping traits among leaders:

These five traits are essential for success in any field. Leaders who possess these traits are able to inspire others, achieve their goals, and make a positive impact on the world.

Actionable Takeaways for Aspiring Leaders

If you want to become a successful leader, there are a number of things you can do to develop the skills that you need. Here are a few actionable takeaways:

• Develop your resilience.  Resilience is the ability to bounce back from setbacks and challenges. You can develop your resilience by practicing optimism, self-compassion, and gratitude. You can also learn from your mistakes and use them as opportunities to grow.
• Become more adaptable.  Adaptability is the ability to change and grow in response to new challenges. You can become more adaptable by being open to new experiences, by learning new skills, and by being willing to take risks.
• Create a clear vision for the future.  A clear vision is essential for success in any field. To create a clear vision, you need to know what you want to achieve and why. You also need to be able to articulate your vision to others and to inspire them to work towards it.
• Communicate effectively.  Effective communication is essential for leaders. You need to be able to clearly and concisely articulate your thoughts and ideas. You also need to be able to listen to others and to understand their needs and perspectives.
• Develop your empathy.  Empathy is the ability to understand the needs and perspectives of others. You can develop your empathy by listening to others, by putting yourself in their shoes, and by trying to see the world from their perspective.

Here are some resources that you can use to further your learning:

• “The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People” by Stephen Covey
• “Leadership and Self-Deception” by The Arbinger Institute
• “Emotional Intelligence” by Daniel Goleman
• Coursera: Leadership and Management Specialization
• edX: Leadership and Management MicroMasters
• LinkedIn Learning: Leadership Foundations
• Harvard Business Review: The Five Essential Skills of a Great Leader
• Forbes: The 7 Traits of Highly Effective Leaders
• Psychology Today: 10 Essential Skills for Effective Leadership

By developing the skills that successful leaders possess, you can increase your chances of success in any field.

Conclusion: The Legacy of Effective Leadership

The skills of effective leadership are essential for success in any field. Leaders who possess these skills are able to inspire others, achieve their goals, and make a positive impact on the world.

The case studies in this article have shown how successful leaders have used their skills to overcome challenges, achieve great things, and leave a lasting legacy. Nelson Mandela used his resilience and vision to lead South Africa to freedom. Satya Nadella used his empathy and innovation to transform Microsoft into a cloud computing leader. Jacinda Ardern used her communication skills and empathy to lead New Zealand through the COVID-19 pandemic.

These are just a few examples of the many successful leaders who have made a difference in the world. By applying the skills of effective leadership in your own life, you can make a positive impact on your community, your organization, and the world.

Take the first step towards mastering these skills today.  Read books, take courses, and practice these skills in your everyday life. The more you develop your leadership skills, the more successful you will be in achieving your goals and making a difference in the world.

Related Posts

Why Emotional Intelligence is the Most Important Leadership Skill

Top 15 Leadership Skills Every Manager Needs to Master in 2024

Best Time Management Tools for Leaders and Professionals

How to Set SMART Goals for Leadership and Personal Development

8 Leadership Skills for First-Time Managers

Kaizen: The Art of Endless Evolution

Delivering Business Improvement Solutions & training.

[email protected]

Quick Links

Subscribe Now

Don’t miss our future updates! Get Subscribed Today!

©2024. Leading Business Improvement. All Rights Reserved.

Courses and bundles are

Use code: lbideals24.

Seize this limited-time offer to unlock lifetime access to the world’s largest library of business improvement tools and techniques. Equip yourself with the knowledge to drive success and outshine your competition.